Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Phase2-hgx333C Take care of invalid SiHits for V16 geometry of HGCal #40381

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 7, 2023

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

Take care of invalid SiHits for V16 geometry of HGCal

PR validation:

Use the test codes in Validation/HGCalValidation/scripts

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Nothing special

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40381/33499

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • Geometry/HGCalCommonData (geometry, upgrade)
  • Validation/HGCalValidation (dqm)

@civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @emanueleusai, @ianna, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @mdhildreth, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@youyingli, @vandreev11, @fabiocos, @sethzenz, @missirol, @rovere, @lgray, @cseez, @apsallid, @pfs, @lecriste, @hatakeyamak, @trtomei, @ebrondol, @beaucero this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40381/33502

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #40381 was updated. @civanch, @Dr15Jones, @bsunanda, @makortel, @emanueleusai, @ianna, @ahmad3213, @cmsbuild, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob, @mdhildreth, @syuvivida, @pmandrik, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please check and sign again.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-51ec36/29730/summary.html
COMMIT: 520f513
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2022-12-20-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/40381/29730/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 12340 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3555748
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 7198
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 28
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3548500
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: found differences in 2 / 47 workflows

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

+geometry

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@srimanob Please sign this PR

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

+Upgrade

Differences are seen in V16 HGCAL geometry.

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@emanueleusai, @ahmad3213 Please approve this PR. It is needed to have the right functionality of V16 geometry of HGCal which is now used in the default Phase2 scenario

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

  • differences in upgrade WFs as expected

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 7, 2023

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

perrotta commented Jan 7, 2023

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants