Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No need to check into base classes of std classes in DictionaryTools. #41908

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2023

Conversation

makortel
Copy link
Contributor

@makortel makortel commented Jun 9, 2023

PR description:

Resolves #41865. By @pcanal (#41865 (comment)).

PR validation:

Code compiles

From Philippe Canal. Checking existence of dictionaries for base
classes of std classes caused missing dictionary errors for
__pair_base with GCC 12.
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 9, 2023

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41908/35861

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 9, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • FWCore/Reflection (core)

@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol, @wddgit this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test for el8_amd64_gcc12

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 9, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8a03/33062/summary.html
COMMIT: 17364e1
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-06-07-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41908/33062/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

There are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline:
10805.31 step 3
The results for the comparisons for these workflows could be incomplete
This means most likely that the IB is having errors in the relvals.The error does NOT come from this pull request

Summary:

  • You potentially added 5744 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 16020 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3219909
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 40269
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3179617
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 9, 2023

-1

Failed Tests: UnitTests
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8a03/33063/summary.html
COMMIT: 17364e1
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-06-08-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41908/33063/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Unit Tests

I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 3 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3219909
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3219886
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8a03/33081/summary.html
COMMIT: 17364e1
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-06-10-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/41908/33081/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 15 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 51 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3220833
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 2228
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3218583
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

please test

for clean dqm comparison

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8a03/33090/summary.html
COMMIT: 17364e1
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_2_X_2023-06-11-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41908/33090/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially removed 8 lines from the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 16 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3190910
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 12
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3190876
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@smuzaffar
Copy link
Contributor

@makortel , this looks good to go in. It does fix the gcc12 relvals

@makortel
Copy link
Contributor Author

+core

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[GCC12] Missing dictionary for __pair_base in many workflows
4 participants