-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No need to check into base classes of std classes in DictionaryTools. #41908
Conversation
From Philippe Canal. Checking existence of dictionaries for base classes of std classes caused missing dictionary errors for __pair_base with GCC 12.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41908/35861
|
A new Pull Request was created by @makortel (Matti Kortelainen) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test for el8_amd64_gcc12 |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8a03/33062/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
|
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8a03/33081/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test for clean dqm comparison |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-db8a03/33090/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@makortel , this looks good to go in. It does fix the gcc12 relvals |
+core |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Resolves #41865. By @pcanal (#41865 (comment)).
PR validation:
Code compiles