-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Change CaloRecHitProducer to produce new HCAL RecHit SoA [14.0.x] #45278
Conversation
Revert column name to detId Code checks and formatting
type pf |
backport #45263 |
A new Pull Request was created by @fwyzard for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @jfernan2 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
cms-bot internal usage |
assign heterogeneous |
+heterogeneous |
enable gpu |
-1 Failed Tests: Build ClangBuild BuildI found compilation error when building: >> Package Utilities/RelMon built >> Subsystem Utilities built Copying tmp/el8_amd64_gcc12/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer/plugins/RecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync/libRecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync_rocm.a to productstore area: cp: cannot stat 'tmp/el8_amd64_gcc12/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer/plugins/RecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync/libRecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync_rocm.a': No such file or directory >> Deleted: tmp/el8_amd64_gcc12/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer/plugins/RecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync/libRecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync_rocm.a gmake: *** [config/SCRAM/GMake/Makefile.rules:1861: tmp/el8_amd64_gcc12/src/RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer/plugins/RecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync/libRecoParticleFlowPFRecHitProducersPluginsPortableROCmAsync_rocm.a] Error 1 gmake: Target 'all' not remade because of errors. gmake: *** [There are compilation/build errors. Please see the detail log above.] Error 2 + eval scram build outputlog '&&' '(python3' /pool/condor/dir_1450086/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/cms-bot/buildLogAnalyzer.py --logDir /pool/condor/dir_1450086/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-06-20-1100/tmp/el8_amd64_gcc12/cache/log/src '||' 'true)' ++ scram build outputlog >> Entering Package RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer Clang BuildI found compilation error while trying to compile with clang. Command used:
>> Local Products Rules ..... started >> Local Products Rules ..... done >> Creating project symlinks >> Entering Package RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer >> Compile sequence completed for CMSSW CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-06-20-1100 gmake: *** [There are compilation/build errors. Please see the detail log above.] Error 1 + eval scram build outputlog '&&' '(python3' /pool/condor/dir_1450086/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/cms-bot/buildLogAnalyzer.py --logDir /pool/condor/dir_1450086/jenkins/workspace/ib-run-pr-tests/CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-06-20-1100/tmp/el8_amd64_gcc12/cache/log/src '||' 'true)' ++ scram build outputlog >> Entering Package RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer Entering library rule at src/RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer/plugins >> Compiling edm plugin src/RecoParticleFlow/PFRecHitProducer/plugins/LegacyPFRecHitProducer.cc |
please test with #45277 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs after it passes the integration tests and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
type hcal |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-d0d703/40001/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
GPU Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Quoting @jsamudio:
PR validation:
Technical-only changes, validated running the HLT over 100k events, and obtaining identical results.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Backport of #45263.