Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

syncing 72X with 71X #5780

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2014
Merged

syncing 72X with 71X #5780

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 15, 2014

Conversation

yiiyama
Copy link
Contributor

@yiiyama yiiyama commented Oct 10, 2014

Synching online application configurations with 71X. This reverts the ECAL uncalibrated rec hit algorithm. For the time being, this will stay as is.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @yiiyama (Yutaro Iiyama) for CMSSW_7_2_X.

syncing 72X with 71X

It involves the following packages:

DQM/Integration

@nclopezo, @danduggan, @rovere, @cmsbuild, @deguio, @ojeda can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@batinkov this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented Oct 13, 2014

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). @nclopezo can you please take care of it?

@yiiyama yiiyama mentioned this pull request Oct 13, 2014
davidlange6 added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 15, 2014
@davidlange6 davidlange6 merged commit 753d15d into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_2_X Oct 15, 2014
@yiiyama yiiyama deleted the ecaldqm-online-config-72X branch October 15, 2014 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants