Pseudo-stream version of JSON monitoring

[avetisya]

This update to HLTrigger/JSONMonitoring switches to the pseudo-stream version and also adds some Level 1 trigger rate information. It requires the toJsonValue() function and thus also pulls in Srecko's changes to EventFilter/Utilities/interface/JsonMonitorable.h per his suggestion.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @avetisya for CMSSW_7_2_X.

Pseudo-stream version of JSON monitoring

It involves the following packages:

EventFilter/Utilities
HLTrigger/JSONMonitoring

@perrotta, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @emeschi, @Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzard, @mommsen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

[Martin-Grunewald]

+1

Remember to make a PR for 73X as well.

[emeschi]

+1
On 29 Oct 2014, at 21:27, cmsbuild <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com> wrote:

A new Pull Request was created by @avetisyahttps://github.com/avetisya for CMSSW_7_2_X.

Pseudo-stream version of JSON monitoring

It involves the following packages:

EventFilter/Utilities
HLTrigger/JSONMonitoring

@perrottahttps://github.com/perrotta, @cmsbuildhttps://github.com/cmsbuild, @nclopezohttps://github.com/nclopezo, @emeschihttps://github.com/emeschi, @Martin-Grunewaldhttps://github.com/Martin-Grunewald, @fwyzardhttps://github.com/fwyzard, @mommsenhttps://github.com/mommsen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
@nclopezohttps://github.com/nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//pull/6095#issuecomment-60998518.

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @nclopezo, @ktf, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

+1
Tested at: f73bec5
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6095/490/summary.html

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_2_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @nclopezo, @ktf, @davidlange6, @smuzaffar

[cmsbuild]

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6095/490/summary.html