Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FastSim new feature -- New syntax for track seeding configuration #803

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 12, 2013

Conversation

giamman
Copy link
Contributor

@giamman giamman commented Sep 12, 2013

By Justas Ruskys.
For the moment, the new syntax is switched off, therefore no change is expected in any validation plot. As soon as pre4 will have been validated, I will switch the new syntax on.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @giamman (Andrea Giammanco) for CMSSW_7_0_X.

new syntax for track seeding configuration

It involves the following packages:

FastSimulation/Tracking

@giamman can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

@giamman
Copy link
Contributor Author

giamman commented Sep 12, 2013

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests.

@nclopezo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

I ran the usual tests on top of CMSSW_7_0_X_2013-09-12-0200, all tests passed:

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/jenkins/job/Pull-Request-Integration/ARCHITECTURE=slc5_amd64_gcc481/474/console

you can see the artifacts here:

https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/474

ktf added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 12, 2013
new syntax for track seeding configuration
@ktf ktf merged commit ff66e2d into cms-sw:CMSSW_7_0_X Sep 12, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants