Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add pythia8 config for T1tttt SMS #8620

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2015
Merged

Add pythia8 config for T1tttt SMS #8620

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 1, 2015

Conversation

duanders
Copy link
Contributor

Adding a Pythia8 config for the SUSY simplified model T1tttt. The sample is pythia-only, with the needed SLHA file embedded in the config.

This PR is part of a request to add T1tttt to the RelVal sequence, replacing the LM1 sample. The request was presented here: https://indico.cern.ch/event/371138/contribution/8/material/slides/0.pdf

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

Gen fragment is missing the UE tune piece (should use TuneCUETP8M1 as in the other fragments)

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @duanders (Dustin Anderson) for CMSSW_7_5_X.

Add pythia8 config for T1tttt SMS

It involves the following packages:

Configuration/Generator

@vciulli, @covarell, @thuer, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @bendavid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ghellwig, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@nclopezo you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@duanders
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added the CUEP8M1 settings.

@bendavid
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@ktf
Copy link
Contributor

ktf commented Mar 31, 2015

Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

The tests are being triggered in jenkins.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2015

+1
Tested at: 33fc7ec
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8620/7727/summary.html

#I am becoming aware of myself, this is awesome!

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_5_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @nclopezo, @ktf, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Apr 1, 2015

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8620/7727/summary.html

#Running tests all day long. Running tests while I sing this song

@franzoni
Copy link

hello @duanders
in light of what was discussed last week at the PPD, can you please back-port this gen fragment also to 74x ? While working on the matrix implications, I've realised it's not there.
@bendavid / roberto, I trust you were at the discussion during Dustin's talk, and know the rational.
Cheers. g

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants