Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DQM to DQMIO #8934

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2015
Merged

DQM to DQMIO #8934

merged 1 commit into from
May 5, 2015

Conversation

threus
Copy link
Contributor

@threus threus commented May 1, 2015

back port of #8933

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 1, 2015

A new Pull Request was created by @threus for CMSSW_7_4_X.

DQM to DQMIO

It involves the following packages:

DQM/SiStripMonitorClient

@cmsbuild, @danduggan, @nclopezo, @deguio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@venturia this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.
If you are a L2 or a release manager you can ask for tests by saying 'please test' in the first line of a comment.
@Degano you are the release manager for this.
You can merge this pull request by typing 'merge' in the first line of your comment.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2015

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2015

Comparison is ready
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-8934/4494/summary.html

The workflows 140.53 have different files in step1_dasquery.log than the ones found in the baseline. You may want to check and retrigger the tests if necessary. You can check it in the "files" directory in the results of the comparisons

@deguio
Copy link
Contributor

deguio commented May 3, 2015

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented May 3, 2015

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_7_4_X IBs unless changes (tests are also fine). This pull request requires discussion in the ORP meeting before it's merged. @davidlange6, @Degano, @smuzaffar

@davidlange6
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants