New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
500 error on badly cleaned up containers/workers #3588
Comments
Update: found these fun logs in the worker.
|
Sorry but without verifiable steps to reproduce, expected/actual results, etc. this isn't really a bug report - it looks like something is definitely wrong, but this is better off in our support forums or in Discord as it will take a bit of digging to get to the bottom of it. From the logs pasted it's not super clear where the bug is (the logs in the second comment show things working normally, if not verbosely). This may be helped by #3079 though, which we're working on. |
👋 @enugentdt, we use the issue tracker exclusively for bug reports and feature requests. However, this issue appears to be a support request. Please ask in the support forums or in Discord instead of opening GitHub issues. |
Have similar error after changed DNS settings and restarted server. |
I just realized I attached the wrong logs... 🤦♂️ I'm sorry about that. Here are the real logs:
What was interesting is that it exited with "exit status 2." My guess is that yeah, #3079 would fix this. It looks like it expects a container to exist, runs a command on the "existing" container, and fails for obvious reasons. Sorry again about attaching the wrong logs! |
I just wanted to update the reproducing steps, as I'm able to consistently make this happen. So might this be worth reopening, @vito ? Steps to reproduce:
When the worker VM comes back up, this is the view you'll get: All the resources show some variation of the following error:
But yes, #3079 will fix this (hopefully). However, it has persisted since early v4, so maybe there's something lower that is upset? Or maybe it's a Garden issue, but I'm not too sure on how Garden works with regards to Concourse. |
@enugentdt Thanks for following up! I think I'll leave this closed anyway though since #3079 is already on our radar will probably be our approach to fixing this in general. 👍 |
No worries at all. Sounds good, and I will be looking forward to the release containing #3079! Thanks |
For anybody stumbling on this issue, I found a manual way of fixing the pipeline. For me, destroying and creating the pipeline again does not fix the issue. Not sure why, but manually checking the resource while the pipeline is still paused after creation fixes the issue. |
Bug Report
I restarted all of my Concourse nodes to apply v5.0.1, but did it badly, and ended up just SIGKILL'ing everything (I'm sorry!). Now that stuff is rebooted, almost every resource is causing this error in Concourse:
Steps to Reproduce
Expected Results
Not this
Actual Results
This
Version Info
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: