You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
it would be nice to have a "composite" field. For example: the Bar entity has a relation with Products. Products count could be very high therefore selecting all the Products or some or all Products except some could be a very tedious task. Having some kind of "controls" before the relation dropdown list, could be really handy sometimes. So in that case I will select All, and all the Products in the dropdown will be selected. Or If I select Except, I can still choose some Products from the dropdown but when I save, it will act as a subtraction instead of linking the selected Products. Does this make sense?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi! I can only offer a "select all" button in the dropdown that will select all loaded items. Maybe you should reconsider your app architecture, maybe there's a better way to acomplish what you need?
Select All would be nice! Unfortunately it's not my choice, it was a request to avoid selecting too many elements (in my example, if the Product count is, say, 1000, and a Bar had to store only 400, the editor must select all 400 by hand).Thank you!
Hi,
it would be nice to have a "composite" field. For example: the Bar entity has a relation with Products. Products count could be very high therefore selecting all the Products or some or all Products except some could be a very tedious task. Having some kind of "controls" before the relation dropdown list, could be really handy sometimes. So in that case I will select All, and all the Products in the dropdown will be selected. Or If I select Except, I can still choose some Products from the dropdown but when I save, it will act as a subtraction instead of linking the selected Products. Does this make sense?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: