dc/dcterms: relation

[tombaker]

EDITED

• dc11:relation (through 2019)

  Comment reads: "Recommended best practice is to
  identify the related resource by means of a string
  conforming to a formal identification system."

• dcterms:relation (ISO 15836-2 / DCMIMT 2020)

  Comment reads: "Recommended practice is to identify
  the related resource by means of a URI. If this is
  not possible or feasible, a string conforming to a
  formal identification system may be provided."

  Like dc11:, no range or range includes.

CHANGING NOW (unless I hear objections!)

• dc11:relation (DCMIMT 2020)

  No changes.

PROPOSING FOR FUTURE (to be voted)

• dc11:relation

  Declare equivalent to dcterms:
  Change comment as per dcterms:

[kcoyle]

Hmm, I didn't realize that we specified "a string conforming to a formal identification system". I would think that folks who have no formal ID system would still need a way to code this, and dc11 could be the answer. I would leave dc11 as it is.

[tombaker]

I did revert that comment, so the original wording will remain unchanged. In the end, the only two /1.1/ comments that I am updating against /terms/ are for date and language - both cases where the comments refer specifically to more recent and up-to-date standards than the ones cited in /1.1/

…

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 3:55 PM Karen Coyle ***@***.***> wrote: Hmm, I didn't realize that we specified "a string conforming to a formal identification system". I would think that folks who have no formal ID system would still need a way to code this, and dc11 could be the answer. I would leave dc11 as it is. — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#92?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAIOBJRZEWXNEL2XDJ5R3MDQ6BYM7A5CNFSM4KHBSAWKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEJEK27A#issuecomment-575188348>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAIOBJWIAXXZUBW6CUV3TVLQ6BYM7ANCNFSM4KHBSAWA> .