Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature request: Allow the width of the terminal to be configurable. (Useful for large/ultrawide monitors) #129

Open
fc-asad opened this issue May 22, 2022 · 6 comments · May be fixed by #889
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@fc-asad
Copy link

fc-asad commented May 22, 2022

Thank you for this great extension.

It would be great to have a feature that allows the users to configure the width of the terminal either in px or percentage. It would be particularly useful for those using large/ultra-wide monitors. So that the terminal takes up defined space at the centre of the screen and not the entire width of the screen.

@alexboutros
Copy link

Would also love to see this implemented.

@syco
Copy link

syco commented Apr 14, 2023

Pleaseeee... it's only 2 extra settings that you probably know exactly where to put:

Width, with a slider, 0% - 100%
Position, either with a slider 0% - 100%, or 3 fixed settings left/center/right

For ultrawide monitors is really needed.

@k0d4
Copy link

k0d4 commented May 15, 2023

+1

@slugcat-dev
Copy link

This is a necessary feature addition in my opinion. It's really annoying having to look to the left all the time when using a ultrawide monitor. Implementation isn't that complicated. An additional one preference slider for the width in percent would be enough, align the terminal window to the center of the screen and thats it.

Regarding horizontal window resizing, do it like the "System Details" dialog in GNOME Settings in the "About" section, where the dialog window is still center aligned to the main window after risizing.

@amezin
Copy link
Member

amezin commented Dec 31, 2023

I will accept a pull request that implements this feature - but only if it wont break anything else.

I'm not going to work on this feature myself, at least in the foreseeable future.

@amezin amezin mentioned this issue Mar 18, 2024
@martinn
Copy link

martinn commented Apr 15, 2024

@amezin I've taken an initial stab at this here #889

There's still a bit more work to do (tests, etc) but let me know what you think when you can please.

@martinn martinn linked a pull request Apr 15, 2024 that will close this issue
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants