You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was asked why the number of packages in a grid doesn't quite match with how many we should for comparisons. This is because we filter out lower scores so that we don't have grids with 100+ columns in them.
In hindsight, we can make this less confusing by showing counts of total packages, active packages, and possibly modifying a view to link off to inactive (score <=0) packages. I think anything is an improvement on just hiding them.
what we can do?
Grids could show active and total package counts
Grids could link to a flatter list of all packages including inactive Grids (Scores that are <=0)
Improve scoring (WIP)
For Grids with too many packages, we should consider how to break them down to the top 4 or 5 and then list everything else in a flatter view.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Overview
I was asked why the number of packages in a grid doesn't quite match with how many we should for comparisons. This is because we filter out lower scores so that we don't have grids with 100+ columns in them.
In hindsight, we can make this less confusing by showing counts of total packages, active packages, and possibly modifying a view to link off to inactive (score <=0) packages. I think anything is an improvement on just hiding them.
what we can do?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: