Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deleted index is coming live again #19477

Closed
aloneldi opened this issue Jul 18, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Deleted index is coming live again #19477

aloneldi opened this issue Jul 18, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@aloneldi
Copy link

Elasticsearch version:
2.2
JVM version:
1.8
OS version:
debian 8.4
Description of the problem including expected versus actual behavior:
Cluster with 3 nodes . Data is being pushed to node 1 in the cluster in bulk => total count 1 million .
After bulk operation complete shutting down node 1 .
Running query to count docs the number is the same as before node 1 shutdown 1 million.
deleting the index .
Counting the number of docs once again => no data
starting node 1 => there are docs but less then 1 million (~800k) .

The expected results is to have none . The join node should get sync with the current master .

Steps to reproduce:

  1. 3 nodes cluster pushing data in bulk using the current master node IP
  2. stop the master node
    3.delete the index
    1. start the previous master node
    2. The index have data again but not as its original count

Provide logs (if relevant):

Describe the feature:

@s1monw
Copy link
Contributor

s1monw commented Jul 18, 2016

fixed by #18249 - we import data in 2.x as we find it. it's a problem but a known and fixed one. thanks for opening the issue

@s1monw s1monw closed this as completed Jul 18, 2016
@aloneldi
Copy link
Author

in which 2.x is it fixed ? 2.3 ? I'm running 2.2 .

Thanks

Alon

@bleskes
Copy link
Contributor

bleskes commented Jul 18, 2016

@aloneldi the fix is 5.0 only sadly - the fix is quite tricky and will not be ported to 2.x.

PS. you can see that reflected by the labels in the #18249 . Also check the corresponding PR, #18250 for some extra background and discussion (if you want)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants