Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replication Actions: Allow to control replication type - async or sync #196

Closed
kimchy opened this issue May 28, 2010 · 1 comment
Closed

Comments

@kimchy
Copy link
Member

kimchy commented May 28, 2010

Allow to control the replication type for index, delete, and delete_by_query operations. The replication type defaults to the node replication setting: action.replication_type, which in turn, defaults to sync.

The replication type can also be set on a per operation basis using the replication parameter accepting the sync, and async values.

@kimchy
Copy link
Member Author

kimchy commented May 28, 2010

Replication Actions: Allow to control replication type - async or sync, closed by 84a5c1e.

williamrandolph pushed a commit to williamrandolph/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2020
williamrandolph pushed a commit to williamrandolph/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Jun 4, 2020
mindw pushed a commit to mindw/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Sep 5, 2022
…lastic#196)

Add TF variable to select AMI version

Added new tfvars variable `sw_version` to simplify AMI selection. By default
it's an empty string (i.e. will not change current behavior of picking latest
AMIs).

To specify an AMI from a specific software version, e.g. v1.9, add
`sw_version = "v1.9."` and TF will pick the latest AMI that matches "v1.9.*".


Approved-by: Can Yildiz
costin pushed a commit that referenced this issue Dec 6, 2022
🤖 ESQL: Merge upstream
cbuescher pushed a commit to cbuescher/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2023
With this commit we document a specific walkthrough for the necessary
steps that need to be done to cleanup and retrigger a failed nightly
benchmark.
emilykmarx pushed a commit to emilykmarx/elasticsearch that referenced this issue Dec 26, 2023
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant