New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Do not use versions to optimize cluster state copying for a first update from a new master #6466
Do not use versions to optimize cluster state copying for a first update from a new master #6466
Conversation
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different.
@@ -560,6 +558,10 @@ public static Client client() { | |||
return client; | |||
} | |||
|
|||
public static Client client(@Nullable String node) { | |||
return node == null? client() : cluster().client(node); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think node can't be null here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
argh... didn't read it properly... nevermind
LGTM |
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
Pushed in with a2ca26e |
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes elastic#6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes elastic#6466
… a first update from a new master We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different. Also improved DiscoveryWithNetworkFailuresTests to simulate this failure (and other improvements) Closes #6466
We have an optimization which compares routing/meta data version of cluster states and tries to reuse the current object if the versions are equal. This can cause rare failures during recovery from a minimum_master_node breach when using the "new light rejoin" mechanism and simulated network disconnects. This happens where the current master updates it's state, doesn't manage to broadcast it to other nodes due to the disconnect and then steps down. The new master will start with a previous version and continue to update it. When the old master rejoins, the versions of it's state can equal but the content is different.
NOTE: this a PR for the feature/improve_zen branch