Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add back string op type to IndexRequest #7387

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kimchy
Copy link
Member

@kimchy kimchy commented Aug 21, 2014

This was removed by accident I think, and it breaks backward comp. on the Java API in minor 1.3 version

This was removed by accident I think, and it breaks backward comp. on the Java API in minor 1.3 version
closes elastic#7387
@s1monw
Copy link
Contributor

s1monw commented Aug 21, 2014

LGTM

@kimchy kimchy closed this in ffcc78c Aug 21, 2014
kimchy added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2014
This was removed by accident I think, and it breaks backward comp. on the Java API in minor 1.3 version
closes #7387
kimchy added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2014
This was removed by accident I think, and it breaks backward comp. on the Java API in minor 1.3 version
closes #7387
@spinscale spinscale changed the title Add back string op type to IndexRequest Java API: Add back string op type to IndexRequest Aug 26, 2014
kimchy added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2014
This was removed by accident I think, and it breaks backward comp. on the Java API in minor 1.3 version
closes #7387
@clintongormley clintongormley added the :Core/Infra/Transport API Transport client API label Jun 7, 2015
@clintongormley clintongormley changed the title Java API: Add back string op type to IndexRequest Add back string op type to IndexRequest Jun 7, 2015
mute pushed a commit to mute/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jul 29, 2015
This was removed by accident I think, and it breaks backward comp. on the Java API in minor 1.3 version
closes elastic#7387
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants