You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have an optimization where we try to delay reroute after we processed the shard started events to try and combine a few into the same event. With teh queueing of shard started events in places, we don't need to do it, and we can reroute right away, which will actually reduce the amount of cluster state events we send.
This will also have a nice side effect of not missing on "waitForRelocatingShards(0)" on cluster health checks since relocations will happen right away.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have an optimization where we try to delay reroute after we processed the shard started events to try and combine a few into the same event. With teh queueing of shard started events in places, we don't need to do it, and we can reroute right away, which will actually reduce the amount of cluster state events we send.
This will also have a nice side effect of not missing on "waitForRelocatingShards(0)" on cluster health checks since relocations will happen right away.
closes#3417
mute
pushed a commit
to mute/elasticsearch
that referenced
this issue
Jul 29, 2015
We have an optimization where we try to delay reroute after we processed the shard started events to try and combine a few into the same event. With teh queueing of shard started events in places, we don't need to do it, and we can reroute right away, which will actually reduce the amount of cluster state events we send.
This will also have a nice side effect of not missing on "waitForRelocatingShards(0)" on cluster health checks since relocations will happen right away.
closeselastic#3417
We have an optimization where we try to delay reroute after we processed the shard started events to try and combine a few into the same event. With teh queueing of shard started events in places, we don't need to do it, and we can reroute right away, which will actually reduce the amount of cluster state events we send.
This will also have a nice side effect of not missing on "waitForRelocatingShards(0)" on cluster health checks since relocations will happen right away.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: