Remove indicesLifecycle.Listener from IndexingMemoryController #6892
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The IndexingMemoryController determines the amount of indexing buffer size and translog buffer size each shard should have. It takes memory from inactive shards (indexing wise) and assigns it to other shards. To do so it needs to know about the addition and closing of shards. The current implementation hooks into the indicesService.indicesLifecycle() mechanism to receive call backs, such shard entered the POST_RECOVERY state. Those call backs are typically run on the thread that actually made the change. A mutex was used to synchronize those callbacks with IndexingMemoryController's background thread, which updates the internal engines memory usage on a regular interval. This introduced a dependency between those threads and the locks of the internal engines hosted on the node. In a *very* rare situation (two tests runs locally) this can cause recovery time outs where two nodes are recovering replicas from each other. This commit introduces a a lock free approach that updates the internal data structures during iterations in the background thread.
|
Tagged as 1.3 |
|
@bleskes I think this looks good though. I left some comments but on the commit :/ I like the removal of the listeners and the sync stuff |
|
@s1monw I pushed another update |
|
NICE LGTM |
bleskes
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2014
The IndexingMemoryController determines the amount of indexing buffer size and translog buffer size each shard should have. It takes memory from inactive shards (indexing wise) and assigns it to other shards. To do so it needs to know about the addition and closing of shards. The current implementation hooks into the indicesService.indicesLifecycle() mechanism to receive call backs, such shard entered the POST_RECOVERY state. Those call backs are typically run on the thread that actually made the change. A mutex was used to synchronize those callbacks with IndexingMemoryController's background thread, which updates the internal engines memory usage on a regular interval. This introduced a dependency between those threads and the locks of the internal engines hosted on the node. In a *very* rare situation (two tests runs locally) this can cause recovery time outs where two nodes are recovering replicas from each other. This commit introduces a a lock free approach that updates the internal data structures during iterations in the background thread. Closes #6892
bleskes
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 17, 2014
The IndexingMemoryController determines the amount of indexing buffer size and translog buffer size each shard should have. It takes memory from inactive shards (indexing wise) and assigns it to other shards. To do so it needs to know about the addition and closing of shards. The current implementation hooks into the indicesService.indicesLifecycle() mechanism to receive call backs, such shard entered the POST_RECOVERY state. Those call backs are typically run on the thread that actually made the change. A mutex was used to synchronize those callbacks with IndexingMemoryController's background thread, which updates the internal engines memory usage on a regular interval. This introduced a dependency between those threads and the locks of the internal engines hosted on the node. In a *very* rare situation (two tests runs locally) this can cause recovery time outs where two nodes are recovering replicas from each other. This commit introduces a a lock free approach that updates the internal data structures during iterations in the background thread. Closes #6892
clintongormley
changed the title
mute
pushed a commit
to mute/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 29, 2015
The IndexingMemoryController determines the amount of indexing buffer size and translog buffer size each shard should have. It takes memory from inactive shards (indexing wise) and assigns it to other shards. To do so it needs to know about the addition and closing of shards. The current implementation hooks into the indicesService.indicesLifecycle() mechanism to receive call backs, such shard entered the POST_RECOVERY state. Those call backs are typically run on the thread that actually made the change. A mutex was used to synchronize those callbacks with IndexingMemoryController's background thread, which updates the internal engines memory usage on a regular interval. This introduced a dependency between those threads and the locks of the internal engines hosted on the node. In a *very* rare situation (two tests runs locally) this can cause recovery time outs where two nodes are recovering replicas from each other. This commit introduces a a lock free approach that updates the internal data structures during iterations in the background thread. Closes elastic#6892
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The IndexingMemoryController determines the amount of indexing buffer size and translog buffer size each shard should have. It takes memory from inactive shards (indexing wise) and assigns it to other shards. To do so it needs to know about the addition and closing of shards. The current implementation hooks into the indicesService.indicesLifecycle() mechanism to receive call backs, such shard entered the POST_RECOVERY state. Those call backs are typically run on the thread that actually made the change. A mutex was used to synchronize those callbacks with IndexingMemoryController's background thread, which updates the internal engines memory usage on a regular interval. This introduced a dependency between those threads and the locks of the internal engines hosted on the node. In a very rare situation (two tests runs locally) this can cause recovery time outs where two nodes are recovering replicas from each other.
This commit introduces a a lock free approach that updates the internal data structures during iterations in the background thread.