New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Latin vs Cyrillic #240
Comments
Could you make some examples to understand better, please? |
|
I do no think this is a good idea: confusable characters should be handled by your editor rather than the font. For instance VS Code implements this feature. There are plenty of confusable chars, so handling them should be preferably automatised to miss none. |
There are numerous different code editors, and I think it infeasible to request all of them implement some kind of checker for confusable characters. There are many precedents of fonts designed to make similar characters differentiable as an intentional decision to make the font accessible for individuals with visual impairments. Atkinson Hyperlegible by the Braille Institute is an excellent example. While this context is less about readability in terms of accessibility concerns, the fact that it is so easy to mix up Latin and Cyrillic characters this way does greatly affect software engineering productivity, which this font is designed to improve on. Thus, if it is possible to differentiate between Latin and Cyrillic characters that look alike, it would be better to do so in the font. @fabrizioschiavi what are your thoughts? |
Thank you to all to letting me understand a bit more this issue. |
IMO a bad idea to invent new letterforms since there's no telling which letterforms are Latin or Cyrillic without already knowing. |
How about making Cyrillic glyphs visually distinct from Latin glyphs? This would help distinguish between Cyrillic and Latin variables that are identical in spelling.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: