Skip to content

Authentication and extension bypass

High
jcoglan published GHSA-qpg4-4w7w-2mq5 Apr 28, 2020

Package

faye (npm, rubygems)

Affected versions

< 1.0.4 || 1.1.0 - 1.1.2 || 1.2.0 - 1.2.4

Patched versions

1.0.4, 1.1.3, 1.2.5

Description

On 20 April 2020 it was reported to me that the potential for authentication
bypass exists in Faye's extension system. This vulnerability has existed in
the Node.js and Ruby versions of the server since version 0.5.0, when extensions
were first introduced, in July 2010. It is patched in versions 1.0.4, 1.1.3 and
1.2.5, which we are releasing today.

The vulnerability allows any client to bypass checks put in place by server-side
extensions, by appending extra segments to the message channel. For example, the
Faye extension docs suggest that users implement access control for
subscriptions by checking incoming messages for the /meta/subscribe channel,
for example:

server.addExtension({
  incoming: function(message, callback) {
    if (message.channel === '/meta/subscribe') {
      if (message.ext.authToken !== 'my super secret password') {
        message.error = 'Invalid auth token';
      }
    }
    callback(message);
  }
});

A bug in the server's code for recognising the special /meta/* channels, which
trigger connection and subscription events, means that a client can bypass this
check by sending a message to /meta/subscribe/x rather than /meta/subscribe:

{
  "channel": "/meta/subscribe/x",
  "clientId": "3jrc6602npj4gyp6bn5ap2wqzjtb2q3",
  "subscription": "/foo"
}

This message will not be checked by the above extension, as it checks the
message's channel is exactly equal to /meta/subscribe. But it will still be
processed as a subscription request by the server, so the client becomes
subscribed to the channel /foo without supplying the necessary credentials.

The vulnerability is caused by the way the Faye server recognises meta channels.
It will treat a message to any channel that's a prefix-match for one of the
special channels /meta/handshake, /meta/connect, /meta/subscribe,
/meta/unsubscribe or /meta/disconnect, as though it were an exact match for
that channel. So, a message to /meta/subscribe/x is still processed as a
subscription request, for example.

An authentication bypass for subscription requests is the most serious effect of
this but all other meta channels are susceptible to similar manipulation.

This parsing bug in the server is fixed in versions 1.0.4, 1.1.3 and 1.2.5.
These should be drop-in replacements for prior versions and you should upgrade
immediately if you are running any prior version.

If you are unable to install one of these versions, you can make your extensions
catch all messages the server would process by checking the channel begins
with the expected channel name, for example:

server.addExtension({
  incoming: function(message, callback) {
    if (message.channel.startsWith('/meta/subscribe')) {
      // authentication logic
    }
    callback(message);
  }
});

Severity

High

CVE ID

CVE-2020-11020

Weaknesses

No CWEs