Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NuGet bug: Microsoft.Scripting.* assemblies shouldn't be referenced #92

Open
tkellogg opened this issue Oct 15, 2012 · 1 comment
Open

Comments

@tkellogg
Copy link

I just installed the IronJS-0.2.0.1 package which includes three Microsoft.Scripting.* DLLs. Two of these assemblies caused build warnings (Microsoft.Scripting.Core and Microsoft.Scripting.ExtensionAttribute) due to multiple assemblies with the same classes. The aspnet compile of Razor views completely failed for the same reason.

I fixed the problem by removing Microsoft.Scripting.Core and Microsoft.Scripting.ExtensionAttribute from the project references. Which brings me to the ultimate question, why were these being referenced at all?

I'm using .NET 4.5. I also asked this stack overflow question about it.

@fholm
Copy link
Owner

fholm commented Oct 15, 2012

They are referenced for the .NET 2.0 build, they must have been included by
mistake in the .NET 4.0 project files.
*

Regards,
Fredrik Holmström*

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 5:06 AM, Tim Kellogg notifications@github.comwrote:

I just installed the IronJS-0.2.0.1 package which includes three
Microsoft.Scripting.* DLLs. Two of these assemblies caused build warnings
(Microsoft.Scripting.Core and Microsoft.Scripting.ExtensionAttribute) due
to multiple assemblies with the same classes. The aspnet compile of Razor
views completely failed for the same reason.

I fixed the problem by removing Microsoft.Scripting.Core and
Microsoft.Scripting.ExtensionAttribute from the project references. Which
brings me to the ultimate question, why were these being referenced at all?

I'm using .NET 4.5. I also asked this stack overflow questionhttp://stackoverflow.com/q/12840880/503826about it.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/92.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants