Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenType features do not work (Missing OTF in Google Fonts package) #42

Open
keikhcheung opened this issue Jan 6, 2021 · 6 comments
Open

Comments

@keikhcheung
Copy link

Take a look at the Space Grotesk website itself and scroll down to the section demonstrating the OpenType features.

It seems that this problem originates from Google Fonts. Only TTF fonts are included in the package hosted there.

@keikhcheung keikhcheung changed the title OpenType features do not seem to work OpenType features do not seem to work (Missing OTF in Google Fonts package) Jan 6, 2021
@keikhcheung keikhcheung changed the title OpenType features do not seem to work (Missing OTF in Google Fonts package) OpenType features do not work (Missing OTF in Google Fonts package) Jan 6, 2021
@iskrisis
Copy link

iskrisis commented Jan 8, 2021

Yeah it seems it's a Google Fonts issue. We can fix the presentation site by linking to the static version but this also probably means the stylistic sets are broken for anyone using Google Fonts.

@mightybart
Copy link
Collaborator

Temporarily fixed as described above, will check later if it's somehow possible to use OT features with GF loaded fonts.

@dahaca
Copy link

dahaca commented Jul 28, 2021

Will that Google Fonts issue be resolved? I would like to use the GFonts instead of static files but need to change the stylistic sets.

@mightybart
Copy link
Collaborator

mightybart commented Jul 28, 2021

I don't know, we can't fix it on our side. But this may be a good place to ask 👉 google/fonts#1335

@dahaca
Copy link

dahaca commented Jul 28, 2021

I don't know, we can't fix it on our side. But this may be a good place to ask 👉 google/fonts#1335

Oh, thought a wrong version was uploaded :D

Thank you for a quick reply!

@milovangudelj
Copy link

Is this still an unresolved issue?

Loading the font from GF gives me the optimisation that I need but it doesn't have a lot of glyphs like .

While loading it from a static file gives me all the glyphs that I need but at the cost of some layout shift caused by lack of loading optimisation.

To be more clear. I'm using Next.js to build my website and it does a great job at optimising web font loading, but that only works with fonts coming from GF and Typekit. Locally loaded fonts don't get the same treatment.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants