You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, many thanks for Hugo (hugo v0.125.2-4e483f5d4abae136c4312d397a55e9e1d39148df linux/amd64 BuildDate=2024-04-20T15:29:44Z VendorInfo=gohugoio)
I just checked the binary version I downloaded from github, and it is huge. Furthermore, it contains 42181 github.com urls and thousands of long paths.
I wonder if "strip" is finding everything it needs to in the hugo binary release. Running strip myself does not decrease the binary size.
$ du -h hugo
79M hugo
$ strings -a -n 10 hugo | grep -c github
42181
$ strings -a -n 10 hugo | grep -c /root/
2412
$ strings -a -n 10 hugo | grep -c /usr/local/
794
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I just checked the binary version I downloaded from github, and it is huge. Furthermore, it contains 42181 github.com urls and thousands of long paths.
It stores the dependency information which I guess can explain some of the bove.
Hi, many thanks for Hugo (hugo v0.125.2-4e483f5d4abae136c4312d397a55e9e1d39148df linux/amd64 BuildDate=2024-04-20T15:29:44Z VendorInfo=gohugoio)
I just checked the binary version I downloaded from github, and it is huge. Furthermore, it contains 42181 github.com urls and thousands of long paths.
I wonder if "strip" is finding everything it needs to in the hugo binary release. Running strip myself does not decrease the binary size.
Does this issue reproduce with the latest release?
Yes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: