Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: allow setting contentEncoding during compose #2431

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 15, 2024

Conversation

zuozp8
Copy link
Contributor

@zuozp8 zuozp8 commented Mar 26, 2024

Fixes #2430

@zuozp8 zuozp8 requested review from a team as code owners March 26, 2024 12:21
Copy link

google-cla bot commented Mar 26, 2024

Thanks for your pull request! It looks like this may be your first contribution to a Google open source project. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

View this failed invocation of the CLA check for more information.

For the most up to date status, view the checks section at the bottom of the pull request.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: xs Pull request size is extra small. api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-storage API. labels Mar 26, 2024
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 changed the title allow setting contentEncoding during compose feat: allow setting contentEncoding during compose Mar 26, 2024
@ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the contribution @zuozp8. It looks like the test

Bucket
       combine
         should make correct API request:

needs to be updated.

@zuozp8
Copy link
Contributor Author

zuozp8 commented Mar 26, 2024

@ddelgrosso1 sure, I updated the test

I made sure my undefined doesn't look and caused content-type to be undefined too in that test

@zuozp8
Copy link
Contributor Author

zuozp8 commented Mar 26, 2024

@ddelgrosso1 linter wants to change files that I didn't touch, should i change them?

wouldn't it be better to commit package-lock.json into repo to avoid unexpected version bumps?

@ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

@zuozp8 don't worry about them, I have another PR open that will fix them. As a general rule, we don't normally commit package locks but sometimes this is the outcome 😆

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Mar 26, 2024
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Mar 26, 2024
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. labels Mar 26, 2024
@gcf-owl-bot gcf-owl-bot bot removed the owlbot:run Add this label to trigger the Owlbot post processor. label Mar 26, 2024
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Mar 26, 2024
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. and removed size: xs Pull request size is extra small. labels Mar 26, 2024
@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 added the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Mar 27, 2024
@yoshi-kokoro yoshi-kokoro removed the kokoro:force-run Add this label to force Kokoro to re-run the tests. label Mar 27, 2024
@ddelgrosso1
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks again for the contribution @zuozp8. I will get this merged / released after Cloud Next is over.

@ddelgrosso1 ddelgrosso1 merged commit 6e81e05 into googleapis:main Apr 15, 2024
16 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-storage API. size: s Pull request size is small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

combining gzipped files
3 participants