You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A few questions on this general topic (let me know if I should take this to the mailing list):
We currently only run scripts on about:blank if they specifically request it (i.e., not if they only @include *. If I'm understanding the logic of this patch correctly, this changes it to only run if additionally, the about:blank window doesn't have any other (i.e. non-blank) about: ancestors. How about only allowing about:blank if it's the top level window? In many cases, frames start with an about:blank URI before having their location changed, and injecting about:blank scripts into those doesn't make too much sense.
What's the current consensus on allowing scripts to run on pages with chrome privileges? We do allow data/about URIs (which can have chrome privileges) if the user enables the preference. I assume allowing any chrome privileged URIs by default is a no-go?
janekptacijarabaci
changed the title
Userscripts work on about: pages (about:addons, about:healthreport...)
Userscripts work on about: pages (about:addons, about:healthreport...) - chrome privileges
Aug 23, 2014
janekptacijarabaci
changed the title
Userscripts work on about: pages (about:addons, about:healthreport...) - chrome privileges
Chrome privileges - userscripts work on about: pages (about:addons, about:healthreport...)
Aug 23, 2014
Ad #1375 (comment)
I don't know if this is a solution:
https://github.com/janekptacijarabaci/greasemonkey/tree/aboutBlank
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: