Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Frame rate for Pupillometry #1

Closed
Phonetiker opened this issue Mar 28, 2019 · 1 comment
Closed

Frame rate for Pupillometry #1

Phonetiker opened this issue Mar 28, 2019 · 1 comment

Comments

@Phonetiker
Copy link

Hello,
In the technical specifications of the camera module, a number of different frame-size-dependent frame rates are provided. Could you say what the raw frame rate is (before resampling) and whether user control of frame rate is possible/advisable in the Jeeliz Pupillometry setup?
Many thanks!

@xavierjs
Copy link
Member

Hi @Phonetiker

According to the specification of the camera module (http://www.elpcctv.com/8mp-highdefinition-usb-camera-module-usb20-sony-imx179-color-cmos-sensor-75degree-lens-p-223.html), the framerate is 15FPS (because we require a 8MP 3264X2448 video feed).

Then it also depends on the lighting. To get good results, the best is to adjust manually the lighting using v4l2ucp (https://github.com/jeeliz/jeelizPupillometry/blob/master/images/screenshots/v4l2ucp.png). If there is too few lighting, the camera will add motion blur, and the real framerate will be below the provided framerate. That's why I use a quite strong light.

But you also need a dedicated graphic card to run the app smoothly. With a weak GPU it may introduce a bottleneck. I tested it on my laptop with a GTX960M and on a Nvidia Jetson TX2 and it works fine. But with the lower GPU of my laptop (An intel HD something) is not enough.

The project has been a bit paused, mainly for funding issues. We have worked on an embedded version of the pupillometer using https://github.com/jeeliz/jetsonjs, but it is still in progress.

Best regards,
Xavier

@xavierjs xavierjs pinned this issue Sep 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants