Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mailpile v1 is obsolete, long live Mailpile v2 ? #2318

Open
BjarniRunar opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Mailpile v1 is obsolete, long live Mailpile v2 ? #2318

BjarniRunar opened this issue Jul 11, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@BjarniRunar
Copy link
Member

Development of Mailpile v1 has stopped! Development of Mailpile v2 has begun! 馃榿

I have closed all open Mailpile v1 issues using the "Mailpile-v1-is-Obsolete" tag, they can be found here: https://github.com/mailpile/Mailpile/issues?q=label%3AMailpile-v1-is-Obsolete+is%3Aclosed

Current development is happening in the https://github.com/mailpile/moggie repository; that work may get merged back into this repository at some point, depending on how I decide to organize the project.

If you need to run the old Mailpile v1, either out of curiosity, or to rescue some data, check out the legacy Docker images: https://github.com/mailpile/Mailpile-v1-Docker

Also, as always, if you are curious about the project take a look at our website and the community discourse.

@h3artbl33d
Copy link

After receiving nearly a thousand notification mails from Github, I came here to checkout what was going on. This is beyond fantastic. Thank you soooooo much for the effort. And thank you NLNET for the grant!

@BjarniRunar
Copy link
Member Author

Sorry about the spam! It was high time to clean up here; if there was a less noisy way to do so I was unaware. Glad to see these happy reactions though, it's very encouraging! <3

@OJFord
Copy link

OJFord commented Jul 14, 2023

The readme here still points at forum saying it's closed source/'stealth mode' btw - might be good to update that to point at moggie?

@BjarniRunar
Copy link
Member Author

It most definitely does not say it's closed source! The code is published, the license is clear.

That said - I am still developing in "quiet mode", I don't intend to really seek out attention until the app is much more fully featured. People are welcome to give it a try and send me friendly feedback, but it's very much not ready for prime time yet. So I think the README is still pretty accurate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants