Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Get rid of monster movement flags, since it's really spline flags.
Thanks to Ralek for research.
- Loading branch information
Showing
20 changed files
with
206 additions
and
182 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
shame to the community? hmm what are you supplying to the community may i ask hmm?
and not to worry its been fixed... well not in mangos anyway smirks
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
besides its ALSO open for comments... I dont see what is so difficult about test-compiling your repo before you commit it.. if you think its perfectly okay to push broken repos remind me not to pull from you ...
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
3raZar3, shut up. There's no compile errors on clean mangos with this commit. And I don't care about forks/custom patches that pulling from our branch without even providing info about commit authors.
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
3raZar3 Really just GTFO.. Tom is by far one of the very best programmers in our scene. I also just tested this build and it compiled fine. Learn2CleanCompile scrub.
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It must be an issue in YOUR coding as a clean of this revision compiles just fine.
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As I mentioned earlier I am not worried about it... evo fixed the flaw in a later commit ... but i suppose mangos will say they stole that as well..
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@everyone - (Evo guy) - just forget about him. Obviously this dude likes to spam mangos git comment places, criticize work that, for what i have seen, for the love of god, Tomrus has made some very hard work over many months, not week or days, months.
@evo Dude - I know what is happening to you. You have never seen Mangos catch up so quickly to the original version. So you are a little bit jealous about Mangos, so what. Dont worry about it, soon Mangos will be in Cataclysm before Cataclysm even hits the original. I mean i got a Worgen Mage right now. And that was in Mangos a long time ago.
@vladimir / theluda - Is there like a parental control thing for git? I dont mind deleting this post but for this dude come on. Since 3.3.2 he has been on mangos like a dog on meat.
tomrus you rock, same for Vladimir and the devs that have work AND WE ALL KNOW THE WORK. Mangos FTW!
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@devs - After some quick search i found the famous "EVO X CORE SUPER MUTANT NINJA TURTLE POWER RANGER" code..
http://github.com/beleko/evo-X-Core/commit/2ea6a599823ef980f35ca1467fe5ba10fc49b33b
Check out those excellent comments. Umm i dont know about you guys but it smells like they are actuallt grabbing code from Mangos....ummm..weird...i swear the Evo Dude just said that mangos was getting info from them....well i "must" be confuse.
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
idk where you get YOUR logic cyrex, but i have been building since 2.4.3 was all there was to build.. so where do you get off saying I only came in since 3.3.2?
you ARE confused.. i openly stated that evo is getting its code from mangos.... vlad knows this as well we have a running convo concerning evo's changing commit statements.. I dont have control ver that and I have also openly stated in thier forums that they should be giving credit where credit is due.. so why not get your story sdtraight CYREX
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
as for catching up quickly.. no i havent seen them do that... 3.3.0a and 332 ARE the fastest they ever pushed..
cyrex.. i understand whats the matter, you cant read thats it isnt it? everytime you comment anything I write, you rarely even comment it correctly...
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The above two comments have been brought to you buy 'Crazy Dude". Crazy Dude, when you need weird stuff happening on Git, use Crazy Dude.
From the makers of WTF???
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
w/e I am done commenting... cyrex.. answer me this... if u are such a PRO-Mangos person.. why did you abandon it to go to trinity (much less why did you come back)
dont bother answering I am unwatching mangos repos...
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lol. Just to clarify you and another friend that also checks this out. Since i do not know how you both think i went to trinity.
I was the last of the SDB devs when it was working, after merging with udb i stay with UDB until some 2 months ago when i moved to YTDB. In all that time i have never ever moved away from Mangos. I like and have always liked the way mangos works on coding and how they first try to fix and correct problems before adding new features. Also the coding standars are very good and i have a very high respect for people liek Vladimir, TomRus, NoFantasy and similar people that work on this day by day. Now, this is the second time you mistake me again, and for somebody else since the first time you mention i was working on some mangchat thing. My only php work was a duper finder and some work on minimanager.
Sup Bruno, Mike and Italo! ;)
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
well I shall have to recant on no more posts... if you arent the cyrex I thought you were well... I have no interest whatsoever as to your concerns or interests =p
i have however removed all my mangos repos and un-watched this repo.. as well as sent a personal apology to tom_rus for how badly this damn thread got out of hand.. I am dropping this arguement.. I'd suggest you do the same.
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would be glad to write my name, if you use my scripts in your repo.... http://github.com/beleko/evo-X-Core/commit/e87f9ab7b5d1c377f03d61f257675494954db176
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Tasssadar... beleko's repo is not my repo... thank cyrex for trying to get everyone to believe that I own evo...
and you are mentioned in my forums (quite often actually) as I like the valhalla-project (although last i knew your sd2 project stilldoesnt compile under windows)
...and not to stir anyone up, but if you are that concerned about what beleko is doing has anyone considered mentioning his abuse inside his git commits?
I will tell u this much if it helps.. beleko = salja
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I am deeply sorry, my post should be deleted, no matter if its your repo or not :( I am was just angry when I saw that :(
986e5b7
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
and just for the record while i believe that people SHOULD get credit out of a matter of respect, I read through the entire license ( found here : http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-2.0.html )
there is absolutely no statement whatsoever that evo-x is required to show individual submissions as being written by anyone.. in fact under the terms of the rights to modify, simplly re-using the same data completely unchanged in content but pushed on a later date is an act of modification and thus the submitter has the right to note that submission as thier own modification.
in short, mangos has no LEGAL right to complain