Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A few SINQ classes don't have unit tests: SINQHMListener, SINQTranspose3D, PoldiPeakDetection2, ... PoldiLoadSpectra #11780

Closed
mantid-builder opened this issue Jan 22, 2015 · 5 comments
Assignees
Labels
Framework Issues and pull requests related to components in the Framework Maintenance Unassigned issues to be addressed in the next maintenance period.

Comments

@mantid-builder
Copy link
Collaborator

This issue was originally TRAC 10941

Original Reporter: @FedeMPouzols

While checking how http://trac.mantidproject.org/mantid/ticket/8492 could be tested, I realized that there is no test for SINQHMListener. Other classes in Framework/SINQ are also missing a unit test:

  • PoldiRemoveDeadWires
  • PoldiPeakDetection2
  • PoldiLoadLog
  • PoldiLoadChopperSlits
  • PoldiAutoCorrelation5
  • PoldiLoadIPP
  • PoldiLoadSpectra
  • SINQTranspose3D
    (all are algorithms).

Probably this is not terribly critical for these classes taken one at a time, but the fact that a good bunch of them don't have unit tests looks a bit reckless.

RST documentation is also missing for:

  • SINQTranspose3D

  • PoldiPeakDetection2

  • PoldiAutoCorrelation5

    Keywords: Maintenance

@mantid-builder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@FedeMPouzols (2015-01-22T10:05:19):
The title was very long.

@mantid-builder mantid-builder added Framework Issues and pull requests related to components in the Framework Maintenance Unassigned issues to be addressed in the next maintenance period. labels Jun 3, 2015
@NickDraper
Copy link
Contributor

is this still valid?

@MichaelWedel
Copy link
Contributor

The Poldi algorithms have been replaced in the meantime or properly documented and tested so for these the issue should be closed. For SINQTranspose3D and SINQHMListener I don't know, this is the domain of @mkoennecke, he knows what the algorithms are doing.

I think it would be best to close this issue and create a new one for the remaining two algorithms which can be forwarded to Mark.

@mkoennecke
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

Am 15.02.2016 um 13:26 schrieb Michael Wedel <notifications@github.commailto:notifications@github.com>:

The Poldi algorithms have been replaced in the meantime or properly documented and tested so for these the issue should be closed. For SINQTranspose3D and SINQHMListener I don't know, this is the domain of @mkoenneckehttps://github.com/mkoennecke, he knows what the algorithms are doing.

I think it would be best to close this issue and create a new one for the remaining two algorithms which can be forwarded to Mark.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/11780#issuecomment-184186163.

Both of these classes are of local use at SINQ only and thus do not need formalized tests. If there would be a Mantid plugin
system they would live in a SINQ-plugin. SINQHMListener is a listener for our SinqHM histogram memory software and an automated
test for that one would need an extra C-executable to be added to Mantid. SINQTranspose3D fixes a data order issue with one of our
instruments.

Regards,

Mark Könnecke

@MichaelWedel
Copy link
Contributor

@mkoennecke, thanks for clarifying!

That means I will close the issue now and not open a new one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Framework Issues and pull requests related to components in the Framework Maintenance Unassigned issues to be addressed in the next maintenance period.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants