New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
More ways of masking detectors based on defined criteria #12112
Comments
@NickDraper (2015-03-10T15:49:01): |
Pascal is looking for far more complicated masking shapes. Talk to him when the time comes to look at this. He did not indicate that this was especially urgent. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. If you feel this is incorrect please comment to keep it alive, with a reason why. To prevent closure, e.g. for long-term planning issues, add the "Never Stale" label. |
This issue has been closed automatically. If this still affects you please re-open this issue with a comment so we can look into resolving it. |
This issue was originally TRAC 11273
We currently have basic mechanisms for automatic masking of detectors based on e.g. thresholds.
There is interest in other automatic masking mechanisms.
Contact Pascal Manuel for more information
After gathering the specific requirements and finding what are existing algs don't do the implementation of this would be great starter tickets for new starters.
Keywords: SSC 2015 all DiffOther
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: