Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure LoadMask in direct inelastic use IDF name rather then instrumet name #12236

Closed
abuts opened this issue Mar 18, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed
Assignees
Labels
Direct Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to direct inelastic High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release.
Milestone

Comments

@abuts
Copy link
Member

abuts commented Mar 18, 2015

This to avoid existing bug in LoadMask, referenced by ticket http://trac.mantidproject.org/mantid/ticket/11395

In addition to that, number of other minor bugs or features were identified after new reduction has been run on instruments and used not exactly as initially supposed. This ticket is a good wrapper to address the identified issues.

@abuts
Copy link
Member Author

abuts commented Jun 3, 2015

This issue was originally trac ticket 11397

@abuts abuts added High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release. Direct Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to direct inelastic labels Jun 3, 2015
@abuts abuts self-assigned this Jun 3, 2015
@abuts abuts added this to the Release 3.4 milestone Jun 3, 2015
@abuts abuts closed this as completed Jun 3, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Direct Inelastic Issues and pull requests related to direct inelastic High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant