Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Sliceviewer intensity incorrect after rebin #12602

Closed
eXeC64 opened this issue May 15, 2015 · 1 comment
Closed

Sliceviewer intensity incorrect after rebin #12602

eXeC64 opened this issue May 15, 2015 · 1 comment
Labels
Stale This label is automatically applied to issues that are automatically closed by the stale bot

Comments

@eXeC64
Copy link
Contributor

eXeC64 commented May 15, 2015

This issue was originally TRAC 11764

If you enable rebin mode in the slice viewer, the intensity indicated when hovering the mouse over the plot shows the pre-rebin intensity, rather than the post-rebin intensity.

It should show the intensity of the rebinned data, if it's being shown.
@eXeC64 eXeC64 added the GUI label Jun 3, 2015
@eXeC64 eXeC64 added this to the Release 3.5 milestone Jun 3, 2015
@NickDraper NickDraper modified the milestones: Release 3.5, Release 3.6 Sep 14, 2015
@NickDraper NickDraper modified the milestone: Release 3.6 Jan 22, 2016
@AntonPiccardoSelg AntonPiccardoSelg removed their assignment Oct 5, 2017
@martyngigg martyngigg added the Stale This label is automatically applied to issues that are automatically closed by the stale bot label Jul 31, 2020
@martyngigg
Copy link
Member

We have little capacity to fix this before 5.1 and there is then no point. It has not caused problems this far. Closing as stale and wontfix.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Stale This label is automatically applied to issues that are automatically closed by the stale bot
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
4 participants
@martyngigg @eXeC64 @NickDraper @AntonPiccardoSelg