Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

"ACLIMAX" provided as a save format option in Tosca CTE interface. #5440

Closed
PeterParker opened this issue Jan 20, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

"ACLIMAX" provided as a save format option in Tosca CTE interface. #5440

PeterParker opened this issue Jan 20, 2012 · 1 comment
Assignees
@PeterParker
Labels
High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release.
Milestone
Release 2.0

Comments

@PeterParker
Copy link
Contributor

Stewart and Timmy would like to see the following as a further option to the already-present SPE, NeXus, NXSPE and ASCII formats, only for TOSCA:

  • A fifth checkbox labelled "ACLIMAX".
  • Rebinning carried out, depending on units:
    • "-2.5,0.01,3,-0.005,500" on meV.
    • "24,-0.005,4000" on cm-1.
  • A saved ACLIMAX file is to be named the same as an ASCII save, but the extension prefixed with "_aclimax", i.e. "[workspace-name]_aclimax.dat" instead of "[workspace-name].dat".
  • The file should also have tabbed separators.
@PeterParker PeterParker added High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release. Mantid labels Jun 3, 2015
@PeterParker PeterParker self-assigned this Jun 3, 2015
@PeterParker PeterParker added this to the Release 2.0 milestone Jun 3, 2015
@PeterParker
Copy link
Contributor Author

This issue was originally trac ticket 4593

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@PeterParker PeterParker

Labels
High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 2.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@PeterParker