Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PropertyWidgets: move to MantidWidgets #5694

Closed
mantid-builder opened this issue Feb 22, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

PropertyWidgets: move to MantidWidgets #5694

mantid-builder opened this issue Feb 22, 2012 · 1 comment
Labels
Low Priority Things that you don't ever want to be done.
Milestone

Comments

@mantid-builder
Copy link
Collaborator

Original Reporter: @jzikovsky

Original Owner: @jzikovsky

From Martyn:

I was just looking at the stuff you've done with property widgets. It looks good but I wonder if the widgets themselves could be moved to the MantidWidgets lib instead? The interface can stay in API but I think it would better if the widgets themselves lived with the MantidWidgets code.

Also, do you think it would be possible to use these with the Qt designer? It's not quite necessary at the moment but would be good for reusing in custom interfaces.

The other small thing was that there is already a widget for finding files, the rather poorly named MWRunFiles widget. This is currently exposed out the designer for people to drop on the UI forms. I don't know how much of the code overlaps with the FilePropertyWidget but would you mind checking whether some of it could be merged in some way?

@mantid-builder
Copy link
Collaborator Author

This issue was originally trac ticket 4847

@mantid-builder mantid-builder added Low Priority Things that you don't ever want to be done. Mantid labels Jun 3, 2015
@mantid-builder mantid-builder added this to the Release 2.1 milestone Jun 3, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Low Priority Things that you don't ever want to be done.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant