Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Engin-X event files crash mantid #6971

Closed
NickDraper opened this issue Nov 14, 2012 · 1 comment
Closed

Engin-X event files crash mantid #6971

NickDraper opened this issue Nov 14, 2012 · 1 comment
Assignees
@martyngigg
Labels
High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release.
Milestone
Release 2.3.1

Comments

@NickDraper
Copy link
Contributor 

This is Saurabh from ENGIN-X. We have been working on getting event mode capability going on ENGIN-X. Last cycle we successfully collected some event mode data. I was trying to load the data on to MANTID but haven’t been able to do so. The instrument definition for ENGIN-X exists on MANTID and we can load regular data without problem. When I try to load event mode data MANTID recognizes the data as event mode and brings up the right dialog box but crashes while loading the file. 

The file I  am trying to load is \\isis\inst$\NDXENGINX\Instrument\data\cycle_12_3\ENGINX00189400.nxs 

Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this? We anticipate doing more and more event mode experiments and therefore want to further develop capabilities of reducing and analysing data in a variety of different ways. I look forward to working with you going forward.

Keywords: PatchCandidate,Released
@NickDraper NickDraper added High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release. Mantid labels Jun 3, 2015
@NickDraper
Copy link
Contributor Author

This issue was originally trac ticket 6125

@NickDraper NickDraper added this to the Release 2.3.1 milestone Jun 3, 2015
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Initial version of anagorithm
d4c4f8c 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Added documentation and error handing when no peaks found
fe508fd 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Switch to scale factor method
1de7ed4 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Work in progress commit
7709ae6 
Adding peak position option

Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Allow user defined peaks
985ee7d 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Update docs for changes in algorithm
6bb67fc 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Merge branch 'master' into 6971_tosca_sample_position_correction
6918ddc 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Add recalculation of sum spectra
e739db1 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Add doc test for correction algo
b088792 
And usage data note for some that were missing it

Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Merge branch 'master' into 6971_tosca_sample_position_correction
36428ba 
Refs #6971
DanNixon added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 2, 2015
@DanNixon
Add unit tests and validation
2f52a11 
Refs #6971
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@martyngigg martyngigg

Labels
High Priority An issue or pull request that if not addressed is severe enough to postponse a release.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
Release 2.3.1
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@martyngigg @NickDraper