Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support .NET Core #389

Open
jpsingleton opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Support .NET Core #389

jpsingleton opened this issue May 18, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@jpsingleton
Copy link

This is just to track support for .NET Core as it's been talked about here and here but I couldn't find an open issue tracking it.

If there are any updates then please send a PR to https://github.com/jpsingleton/ANCLAFS and I'll update https://anclafs.com.

Cheers

@h0wXD
Copy link

h0wXD commented Sep 28, 2018

In one of the articles is mentioned porting 0.19 to core would be a mammoth task, this is no longer true.
I got Simple.Data master running on .net core 2.1 for SqlServer within a very short time (1 hour~). Someone may look at fully porting it properly as I just wanted to know if it would work out of the box and it does.

For people interested in what changes were needed, have a look here: h0wXD@fffc3c9

Thanks for this awesome library!

@jdscolam
Copy link
Contributor

This is nearly the last thing that is keeping us from adopting .NET Core.

@j-hudecek
Copy link

I've made some more conversions and managed to get most of the tests to pass - I had to remove SQL CE (no one uses it anyway) though:

j-hudecek@671262a

@santoshbhor
Copy link

santoshbhor commented Sep 14, 2019

Guys I was able to get everything working with .Net core (2.1,2.2,3.0 preview 9)
Please check my repo: https://github.com/santoshbhor/Simple.Data.Core...
Currently Following adapters were ported and tested as well SQLServer,Oracle,Npgsql, RawSql

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants