We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The api docs for matplotlib.artist.get and matplotlib.artist.getp are exactly the same
matplotlib.artist.get
matplotlib.artist.getp
see http://matplotlib.org/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.artist.get vs http://matplotlib.org/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.artist.getp
If both methods should be there the the get (without the 'p') should be called with get(obj) rather than getp(obj) as stated.
get
get(obj)
getp(obj)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Technically yes, it has actually been implemented as an alias (https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/blob/master/lib/matplotlib/artist.py#L1228). This does break the "one good way to do something" rule (actually, so does getp altogether, but that is another issue) - perhaps we should just remove one from the docs...
getp
I'm going to close this issue - but feel free to submit a PR if you're inclined to update the docs, and I'll happily merge.
Cheers!
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The api docs for
matplotlib.artist.get
andmatplotlib.artist.getp
are exactly the samesee
http://matplotlib.org/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.artist.get
vs
http://matplotlib.org/api/artist_api.html#matplotlib.artist.getp
If both methods should be there the the
get
(without the 'p') should be called withget(obj)
rather thangetp(obj)
as stated.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: