Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

v2.x failures on travis #6120

Closed
tacaswell opened this issue Mar 7, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

v2.x failures on travis #6120

tacaswell opened this issue Mar 7, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@tacaswell
Copy link
Member

======================================================================
FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_log_scales.test
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 198, in runTest
    self.test(*self.arg)
  File "/home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/matplotlib-1.5.1+260.gebfbc4a-py3.5-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py", line 54, in failer
    result = f(*args, **kwargs)
  File "/home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/matplotlib-1.5.1+260.gebfbc4a-py3.5-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py", line 245, in do_test
    '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
matplotlib.testing.exceptions.ImageComparisonFailure: images not close: /home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/result_images/test_axes/log_scales_svg.png vs. /home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/result_images/test_axes/log_scales-expected_svg.png (RMS 0.009)
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can not reproduce this locally, can anyone else?

@tacaswell tacaswell added this to the 2.0 (style change major release) milestone Mar 7, 2016
@WeatherGod
Copy link
Member

That is a tiny, tiny diff, and in the SVG, too. Could it be a change in
inkscape?

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:52 PM, Thomas A Caswell notifications@github.com
wrote:

======================================================================FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_axes.test_log_scales.test----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/nose/case.py", line 198, in runTest
self.test(_self.arg)
File "/home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/matplotlib-1.5.1+260.gebfbc4a-py3.5-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py", line 54, in failer
result = f(_args, **kwargs)
File "/home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/venv/lib/python3.5/site-packages/matplotlib-1.5.1+260.gebfbc4a-py3.5-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py", line 245, in do_test
'(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
matplotlib.testing.exceptions.ImageComparisonFailure: images not close: /home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/result_images/test_axes/log_scales_svg.png vs. /home/travis/build/matplotlib/matplotlib/result_images/test_axes/log_scales-expected_svg.png (RMS 0.009)----------------------------------------------------------------------

I can not reproduce this locally, can anyone else?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#6120.

@mdboom
Copy link
Member

mdboom commented Mar 7, 2016

Yeah -- I suspect the reason we can't reproduce locally is most of us have a newer version of Inkscape than on Travis. The differences -- particularly when looking at the content of the SVG itself -- are all inconsequential. I think the best fix is probably just replace the SVG with the new output.

@tacaswell tacaswell self-assigned this Mar 7, 2016
tacaswell added a commit to tacaswell/matplotlib that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2016
This appears to be a backporting error.

Closes matplotlib#6120
@jenshnielsen
Copy link
Member

Fixed by #6127

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants