You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation of Delaunay interpolator returns NaN for grids whose x or y has dimension 1 (i.e. when you try to interpolate along a horizontal/vertical line, or in a single point). See example below.
It seems that this can be fixed by simple rearrangement of calculations (pull request underway).
The suggested implementation is almost identical. It might actually perform faster in some cases (there is one less multiplication op in the inner loop). There might be some differences in accuracy, but I believe they should only become observable in cases where the grid size is very large (which would probably cause memory problems anyway).
Example (before suggested patch):
>>> from matplotlib.delaunay import Triangulation
>>> tri = Triangulation([0,10,10,0],[0,0,10,10])
>>> lin = tri.linear_interpolator([1,10,5,2.0])
>>> # 2x2 grid works fine
>>> lin[3:6:2j,1:4:2j]
array([[ 1.6, 3.1],
[ 1.9, 2.8]])
>>> # but not when 1x2, 2x1, 1x1:
>>> lin[3:6:2j,1:1:1j]
array([[ nan],
[ nan]])
>>> lin[3:3:1j,1:1:1j]
array([[ nan]])
>>>
After suggested patch:
>>> from matplotlib.delaunay import Triangulation
>>> tri = Triangulation([0,10,10,0],[0,0,10,10])
>>> lin = tri.linear_interpolator([1,10,5,2.0])
>>> # 2x2 grid: same same
>>> lin[3:6:2j,1:4:2j]
array([[ 1.6, 3.1],
[ 1.9, 2.8]])
>>> # but these work now
>>> lin[3:6:2j,1:1:1j]
array([[ 1.6],
[ 1.9]])
>>> lin[3:3:1j,1:1:1j]
array([[ 1.6]])
>>>
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current implementation of Delaunay interpolator returns NaN for grids whose x or y has dimension 1 (i.e. when you try to interpolate along a horizontal/vertical line, or in a single point). See example below.
It seems that this can be fixed by simple rearrangement of calculations (pull request underway).
The suggested implementation is almost identical. It might actually perform faster in some cases (there is one less multiplication op in the inner loop). There might be some differences in accuracy, but I believe they should only become observable in cases where the grid size is very large (which would probably cause memory problems anyway).
Example (before suggested patch):
After suggested patch:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: