FAQ and unit/ still refers to nxutils #3004
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
All red! 👍 |
|
Let's just hope Travis is all green :) |
|
So, almost all green, and I don't see where the error from 2.7 is coming from. I think this is safe to merge. |
|
I want to merge the big how_to doc PR first as I think that they might conflict and would rather do the patch up on the simpler PR. |
tacaswell
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2014
FAQ and unit/ still refers to nxutils
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The FAQ and
unit/inside_poly_{memleak,profile}.pyshould be updated now that nxutils has been removed.