Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nuscenes-mini Performance on TestSet Lower than the official results #552

Open
wstzx opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

nuscenes-mini Performance on TestSet Lower than the official results #552

wstzx opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@wstzx
Copy link

wstzx commented Nov 14, 2023

Hello author, thank you so much for open sourcing your code. I tried to run your latest code using nuscenes-mini on a single GPU on 3090 and A5000, and it showed: 7.RuntimeError: Given groups=1, weight of size [8, 1, 1, 1], expected input[12, 6, 256, 704] to have 1 channels, but got 6 channels instead , so I setmmdet3d/models/vtransforms/base line37 and line38: False, but the results of the test MAP = 58, and after I used the two other old version to test, the result is only 58, far lower than the final result, is the reason I used one GPU?Here are the results of my single GPU tests in nuscenes-mini.This is my run command:
torchpack dist-run -np 1 python tools/test.py configs/nuscenes/det/transfusion/secfpn/camera+lidar/swint_v0p075/convfuser.yaml pretrained/bevfusion-det.pth --eval bbox
Uploading 1699876206693.png…

@ZoeSnow
Copy link

ZoeSnow commented Nov 26, 2023

The same problem. Do you have any new progress?

@qpc001
Copy link

qpc001 commented Nov 29, 2023

The same problem.

@zhijian-liu
Copy link
Contributor

We haven't used the mini dataset in our experiments. Have you tried the full dataset to see if the same issue still persists?

@zhijian-liu zhijian-liu self-assigned this May 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants