Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

store_large unit test always failing on s390x #262

Open
jcharaoui opened this issue Apr 6, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

store_large unit test always failing on s390x #262

jcharaoui opened this issue Apr 6, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jcharaoui
Copy link
Contributor

When running the test suite in the ruby-moneta Debian package, this test always fails on the s390x architecture:

 94s   1) adapter_client store_large feature should store values up to 32k
 94s      Failure/Error: store['large'].should == value
 94s 
 94s      EOFError:
 94s        Server closed socket
 94s      Shared Example Group: :store_large called from ./spec/helper.rb:273
 94s      # ./spec/features/store_large.rb:5:in `block (2 levels) in <top (required)>'
 94s      # /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-retry-0.6.2/lib/rspec/retry.rb:124:in `block in run'
 94s      # /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-retry-0.6.2/lib/rspec/retry.rb:110:in `loop'
 94s      # /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-retry-0.6.2/lib/rspec/retry.rb:110:in `run'
 94s      # /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-retry-0.6.2/lib/rspec_ext/rspec_ext.rb:12:in `run_with_retry'
 94s      # /usr/share/rubygems-integration/all/gems/rspec-retry-0.6.2/lib/rspec/retry.rb:37:in `block (2 levels) in setup'

Full test log: https://ci.debian.net/packages/r/ruby-moneta/testing/s390x/44820547/

I understand tracking this down might not be straightforward if you don't have access to an IBM mainframe, but I'm opening this ticket in case you might figure out an obvious cause for this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant