Rewrite the macros chapter

This is a more introductory document, suitable for Part II.  The arcane details
move to an "Advanced macros" chapter in Part III.

src/doc/trpl/SUMMARY.md

@@ -28,12 +28,13 @@
     * [Generics](generics.md)
     * [Traits](traits.md)
     * [Static and Dynamic Dispatch](static-and-dynamic-dispatch.md)
+    * [Macros](macros.md)
     * [Concurrency](concurrency.md)
     * [Error Handling](error-handling.md)
     * [Documentation](documentation.md)
 * [III: Advanced Topics](advanced.md)
     * [FFI](ffi.md)
     * [Unsafe Code](unsafe.md)
-    * [Macros](macros.md)
+    * [Advanced Macros](advanced-macros.md)
     * [Compiler Plugins](plugins.md)
 * [Conclusion](conclusion.md)

src/doc/trpl/advanced-macros.md

@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+% Advanced macros
+
+This chapter picks up where the [introductory macro chapter](macros.html) left
+off.
+
+# Syntactic requirements
+
+Even when Rust code contains un-expanded macros, it can be parsed as a full
+syntax tree. This property can be very useful for editors and other tools that
+process code. It also has a few consequences for the design of Rust's macro
+system.
+
+One consequence is that Rust must determine, when it parses a macro invocation,
+whether the macro stands in for
+
+* zero or more items,
+* zero or more methods,
+* an expression,
+* a statement, or
+* a pattern.
+
+A macro invocation within a block could stand for some items, or for an
+expression / statement. Rust uses a simple rule to resolve this ambiguity. A
+macro invocation that stands for items must be either
+
+* delimited by curly braces, e.g. `foo! { ... }`, or
+* terminated by a semicolon, e.g. `foo!(...);`
+
+Another consequence of pre-expansion parsing is that the macro invocation must
+consist of valid Rust tokens. Furthermore, parentheses, brackets, and braces
+must be balanced within a macro invocation. For example, `foo!([)` is
+forbidden. This allows Rust to know where the macro invocation ends.
+
+More formally, the macro invocation body must be a sequence of *token trees*.
+A token tree is defined recursively as either
+
+* a sequence of token trees surrounded by matching `()`, `[]`, or `{}`, or
+* any other single token.
+
+Within a matcher, each metavariable has a *fragment specifier*, identifying
+which syntactic form it matches.
+
+* `ident`: an identifier. Examples: `x`; `foo`.
+* `path`: a qualified name. Example: `T::SpecialA`.
+* `expr`: an expression. Examples: `2 + 2`; `if true then { 1 } else { 2 }`; `f(42)`.
+* `ty`: a type. Examples: `i32`; `Vec<(char, String)>`; `&T`.
+* `pat`: a pattern. Examples: `Some(t)`; `(17, 'a')`; `_`.
+* `stmt`: a single statement. Example: `let x = 3`.
+* `block`: a brace-delimited sequence of statements. Example:
+  `{ log(error, "hi"); return 12; }`.
+* `item`: an [item][]. Examples: `fn foo() { }`; `struct Bar;`.
+* `meta`: a "meta item", as found in attributes. Example: `cfg(target_os = "windows")`.
+* `tt`: a single token tree.
+
+There are additional rules regarding the next token after a metavariable:
+
+* `expr` variables must be followed by one of: `=> , ;`
+* `ty` and `path` variables must be followed by one of: `=> , : = > as`
+* `pat` variables must be followed by one of: `=> , =`
+* Other variables may be followed by any token.
+
+These rules provide some flexibility for Rust's syntax to evolve without
+breaking existing macros.
+
+The macro system does not deal with parse ambiguity at all. For example, the
+grammar `$($t:ty)* $e:expr` will always fail to parse, because the parser would
+be forced to choose between parsing `$t` and parsing `$e`. Changing the
+invocation syntax to put a distinctive token in front can solve the problem. In
+this case, you can write `$(T $t:ty)* E $e:exp`.
+
+[item]: ../reference.html#items
+
+# Scoping and macro import/export
+
+Macros are expanded at an early stage in compilation, before name resolution.
+One downside is that scoping works differently for macros, compared to other
+constructs in the language.
+
+Definition and expansion of macros both happen in a single depth-first,
+lexical-order traversal of a crate's source. So a macro defined at module scope
+is visible to any subsequent code in the same module, which includes the body
+of any subsequent child `mod` items.
+
+A macro defined within the body of a single `fn`, or anywhere else not at
+module scope, is visible only within that item.
+
+If a module has the `macro_use` attribute, its macros are also visible in its
+parent module after the child's `mod` item. If the parent also has `macro_use`
+then the macros will be visible in the grandparent after the parent's `mod`
+item, and so forth.
+
+The `macro_use` attribute can also appear on `extern crate`. In this context
+it controls which macros are loaded from the external crate, e.g.
+
+```rust,ignore
+#[macro_use(foo, bar)]
+extern crate baz;
+```
+
+If the attribute is given simply as `#[macro_use]`, all macros are loaded. If
+there is no `#[macro_use]` attribute then no macros are loaded. Only macros
+defined with the `#[macro_export]` attribute may be loaded.
+
+To load a crate's macros *without* linking it into the output, use `#[no_link]`
+as well.
+
+An example:
+
+```rust
+macro_rules! m1 { () => (()) }
+
+// visible here: m1
+
+mod foo {
+    // visible here: m1
+
+    #[macro_export]
+    macro_rules! m2 { () => (()) }
+
+    // visible here: m1, m2
+}
+
+// visible here: m1
+
+macro_rules! m3 { () => (()) }
+
+// visible here: m1, m3
+
+#[macro_use]
+mod bar {
+    // visible here: m1, m3
+
+    macro_rules! m4 { () => (()) }
+
+    // visible here: m1, m3, m4
+}
+
+// visible here: m1, m3, m4
+# fn main() { }
+```
+
+When this library is loaded with `#[macro_use] extern crate`, only `m2` will
+be imported.
+
+The Rust Reference has a [listing of macro-related
+attributes](../reference.html#macro--and-plugin-related-attributes).
+
+# The variable `$crate`
+
+A further difficulty occurs when a macro is used in multiple crates. Say that
+`mylib` defines
+
+```rust
+pub fn increment(x: u32) -> u32 {
+    x + 1
+}
+
+#[macro_export]
+macro_rules! inc_a {
+    ($x:expr) => ( ::increment($x) )
+}
+
+#[macro_export]
+macro_rules! inc_b {
+    ($x:expr) => ( ::mylib::increment($x) )
+}
+# fn main() { }
+```
+
+`inc_a` only works within `mylib`, while `inc_b` only works outside the
+library. Furthermore, `inc_b` will break if the user imports `mylib` under
+another name.
+
+Rust does not (yet) have a hygiene system for crate references, but it does
+provide a simple workaround for this problem. Within a macro imported from a
+crate named `foo`, the special macro variable `$crate` will expand to `::foo`.
+By contrast, when a macro is defined and then used in the same crate, `$crate`
+will expand to nothing. This means we can write
+
+```rust
+#[macro_export]
+macro_rules! inc {
+    ($x:expr) => ( $crate::increment($x) )
+}
+# fn main() { }
+```
+
+to define a single macro that works both inside and outside our library. The
+function name will expand to either `::increment` or `::mylib::increment`.
+
+To keep this system simple and correct, `#[macro_use] extern crate ...` may
+only appear at the root of your crate, not inside `mod`. This ensures that
+`$crate` is a single identifier.
+
+# A final note
+
+Macros, as currently implemented, are not for the faint of heart. Even
+ordinary syntax errors can be more difficult to debug when they occur inside a
+macro, and errors caused by parse problems in generated code can be very
+tricky. Invoking the `log_syntax!` macro can help elucidate intermediate
+states, invoking `trace_macros!(true)` will automatically print those
+intermediate states out, and passing the flag `--pretty expanded` as a
+command-line argument to the compiler will show the result of expansion.
+
+If Rust's macro system can't do what you need, you may want to write a
+[compiler plugin](plugins.html) instead. Compared to `macro_rules!`
+macros, this is significantly more work, the interfaces are much less stable,
+and the warnings about debugging apply ten-fold. In exchange you get the
+flexibility of running arbitrary Rust code within the compiler. Syntax
+extension plugins are sometimes called *procedural macros* for this reason.