Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Printing +/-0 with "%g" doesn't fall back to decimal mode #121

Open
eyalroz opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

Printing +/-0 with "%g" doesn't fall back to decimal mode #121

eyalroz opened this issue Aug 5, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@eyalroz
Copy link

eyalroz commented Aug 5, 2021

If we printf_("%g", 0.), we get "0e+00"; we should be getting just "0". See also #75, #55, #48 about "%g" issues.

eyalroz added a commit to eyalroz/printf that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2021
…ent check, since their exponent is a special case - 0 rather minus infinity.
eyalroz added a commit to eyalroz/printf that referenced this issue Aug 5, 2021
…ent check, since their exponent is a special case - 0 rather minus infinity.
eyalroz added a commit to eyalroz/printf that referenced this issue Aug 6, 2021
…ent check, since their exponent is a special case - 0 rather minus infinity.
KarlK90 pushed a commit to qmk/printf that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2022
…or `%#b`, like for `%#x`, when a precision is field width is specified and we are matching it exactly. Also, added some test suite checks for this bug.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant