Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ICA-AROMA for the further analysis #1799

Closed
yuan0821 opened this issue Sep 29, 2019 · 7 comments
Closed

ICA-AROMA for the further analysis #1799

yuan0821 opened this issue Sep 29, 2019 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@yuan0821
Copy link

I am a newer user for fmriprep . Now I finished the preprocessing using the comm of --use-aroma --use-syn-sdc. And I get the files like 'sub-003_ses-01_task-rest_run-001_space-MNI152NLin2009cAsym_desc-smoothAROMAnonaggr_bold.nii.gz'.

  1. I wonder if this 'smoothAROMAnonaggr' file has been regressed out the effect of motion, CSF,WM and Global signal. If so, can I use this file to perform bass-pass filter (0.01-0.1 HZ for the resting state) and functional connectivity analysis?
  2. After functional connectivity, If I wan to perform group analysis, should I consider the motion effect and put the meanFD into the EV and regressed out. Is it right?
    Thank you very much for any help.
    @chrisgorgo
@yuan0821 yuan0821 changed the title ICA-AROMA for the futher analysis ICA-AROMA for the further analysis Sep 29, 2019
@jdkent
Copy link
Collaborator

jdkent commented Sep 29, 2019

Hi and thanks for reaching out.

  1. smoothAROMAnonaggr has only spatial smoothing and motion correction applied with the AROMA noise components "non-aggressively" removed. you can see this post for more details on potential regressor strategies

  2. If I understand correctly, I do often include the meanFD in my between participant models to account for overall motion differences, but I do not have a paper offhand to justify this behavior.

Let me know if this answers your questions, and if you have further questions like this, I recommend using neurostars so more people can benefit from the answers provided here.

@effigies
Copy link
Member

Hi @yuan0821. I would also recommend going to Neurostars for advice on analysis choices. The fMRIPrep issues are generally for bugs and clarifications in fMRIPrep operation.

I believe your first question was part of #817 (comment)? Do you need further clarification?

@yuan0821
Copy link
Author

yuan0821 commented Oct 1, 2019

Thank you very much for your advice. I need to confirm now whether it is appropriate for me to do this.
smoothAROMAnonaggrs just do spatial smoothing and motion correction, right?
If I use a smoothAROMAnonaggrs file for functional connection analysis, it means that I need to regress the CSF/WM components and aroma_motion components(from confounds_regressors.tsv). Then perform the bass-pass filter. Finally, when doing a group-level comparison, use the mean FD as a covariable
Thanks again for your kind help. @jdkent @effigies

@effigies
Copy link
Member

effigies commented Oct 3, 2019

smoothAROMAnonaggrs just do spatial smoothing and motion correction, right?

And AROMA non-aggressive denoising.

If I use a smoothAROMAnonaggrs file for functional connection analysis, it means that I need to regress the CSF/WM components and aroma_motion components(from confounds_regressors.tsv).

No, this would be invalid. CSF/WM components are calculated on the non-denoised dataset, and those regressors do not properly apply. And the AROMA components will have already been removed (according to the non-aggressive strategy).

Then perform the bass-pass filter. Finally, when doing a group-level comparison, use the mean FD as a covariable

I don't have enough experience to give advice here.


Note that this is the same as https://neurostars.org/t/ica-aroma-for-the-further-analysis/5144. Please choose one forum or the other to post questions, rather than both.

@oesteban
Copy link
Member

oesteban commented Oct 3, 2019

Note that this is the same as https://neurostars.org/t/ica-aroma-for-the-further-analysis/5144. Please choose one forum or the other to post questions, rather than both.

Totally agreed, let's follow up there as it will have more visibility 👍

@yuan0821
Copy link
Author

yuan0821 commented Oct 5, 2019

Thank you very much!!!
I just read the paper 'ICA-AROMA: A robust ICA-based strategy for removing motion artifacts
from fMRI data'. So as my understanding, smoothAROMAnonaggrs is a file that motion noise components have been removed. But WM, CSF... components have not been regressed out but just extract their time series, right?? If so, I should do

  1. nuisance regression for CSF, WM...(using comm fsl_glm -i smoothAROMAnonaggrs.nii.gz -d design_with_nuisance.mat --out_res= nuisance_smoothAROMAnonaggrs.nii.gz);

  2. bandpass (using comm: fslmaths nuisance_smoothAROMAnonaggrs.nii.gz -bptf <hp_sigma> <lp_sigma> filtered_nuisance_smoothAROMAnonaggrs.nii.gz filter)??

I appreciate any suggestions you @effigies give. Thank you very much.

@effigies
Copy link
Member

effigies commented Oct 8, 2019

The time series of WM CSF have not been calculated from the AROMA-denoised BOLD series. Regressing them out is probably not valid.

Regarding bandpass filtering, I have no experience with that. I would recommend asking about bandpass filtering WRT AROMA on Neurostars, where there are contributors with much more experience.

@jdkent jdkent mentioned this issue Nov 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants