Reimplement it all in a high-level language

[nvie]

Expanding git-flow is becoming increasingly tedious. The subcommand structure isn't flexible enough to support heterogenous subcommand styles and flag parsing is a pain in the ass to get right on all platforms.

Also, there is a lot of duplication in the code already because of limitations in the way sh forces you structure your code.

This calls for a total reimplementation in a higher-level language of choice. That will be Python. Since the project is still rather small, this should not be too big an issue.

[nvie]

I'll put up a skeleton for this rewrite soon. Hang in there.

[kennethreitz]

Going schizo on us? :P

If you're cool with Python, I'd be happy to implement.

[tianon]

Just for curiosity's sake, in your git-model if you wanted to implement something like this (a complete rewrite in a totally different language), but wanted to continue development on the old stuff concurrently, would the rewrite be best developed in a feature branch pushed to origin? Not that this is necessarily the way you personally want to implement this, but this seems a good place to discuss such a workflow. It would make sense to me to create a feature branch for something like this, but I am very interested in "checking my work" against another mind, if you will.

[tianon]

... of course, after I post that, I notice you've already done just that. Kudos! :)

[nvie]

Yes, the base for it is available in http://github.com/nvie/gitflow/tree/feature/python-rewrite. It's not much yet, but as soon as I find the time, I'll start making new committing there. Then, it'll soon be up to the point where it will be easier for people to start submitting patches!

[kilianc]

git flow it's gonna be a standard... please let it works on my mac :)

[keithamus]

You may want to look at Scriptine:

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/scriptine/0.2.0a2

It is a wrapper for CLI access which can make light work of interfacing to a CLI like bash.

Thanks for the great project!

[dolmen]

msysgit already has to bundle:

• Perl 5
• TCL 8.5

Don't you think this is enough?

[eloyesp]

I known I'm late, but I would prefer ruby because I know it, but it also have gems to gems (libraries) to help.

• git helpers
• commandline binaries

On the bad side, ruby is not more easy on windows than python.
On the good side, the ruby community is more git driven than python's.

[kennethreitz]

I think bash is the best choice.

[mgaitan]

is this idea abandoned? I couldn't find the above mentioned branch ( https://github.com/nvie/gitflow/tree/feature/python-rewrite ) I was looking for specially to see/work on the documentation (#75 refers here)

[webwurst]

@kennethreitz did something similar: Legit
Won't help you with documentation, so just for info..

[88Alex]

+1 for rewriting in Ruby. I personally prefer Ruby over Python (more powerful, clearer syntax, lots of 3rd-party code available).

[88Alex]

I think it's time to start the Python/Ruby rewrite (I think Ruby is better). Ruby has lots of nice modules and gems (i.e. OptionParser, GLI) that make writing command-line tools much easier.

[jbiason]

Python also have modules for command-line tools directly in the standard library. Check ArgParse (http://docs.python.org/2.7/library/argparse.html) and cmd (http://docs.python.org/2.7/library/cmd.html). This means there is no need to go after any external "gems" or anything.

[kennethreitz]

meh, the whole thing should be bash :)

[robertwe]

@kennethreitz and dude you are right here.

[SparK-Cruz]

Will I be crucifield if I say Java?
(at least it's multi-platform)

[88Alex]

Actually, Java would also work. However, unlike the other suggestions, Java must be compiled, which could lead to a minor inconvenience.
(Fun fact: Java is more than 32 times faster than Python!)

[tdjordan]

You could use groovy instead.
That way it wouldn't need to be precompiled.
On Jul 15, 2013 2:10 PM, "Alex" notifications@github.com wrote:

Actually, Java would also work. However, unlike the other suggestions,
Java must be compiled, which could lead to a minor inconvenience.
(Fun fact: Java is more than 32 times faster than Python!)

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/33#issuecomment-20995978
.

[mgaitan]

Please, stop flooding this thread. Nobody will work on a reimplementation in your preferred language just because you requests that here. Start it yourself and then ask for help.

btw, +1 to close it with "won't fix" (it seems the not explicit decision)

[SparK-Cruz]

@mgaitan we are only seeing pros and cons of every language
when we convince eachother to use a certain language (or majority of people choose a language) one of us will definetively start the project.

[HerrBvomSee]

But in June 2012 Vincent closed the pull-request and deleted his python-rewrite branch. So Hartmut decided to release the Python rewrite on his own. (Reference: https://github.com/htgoebel/gitflow#history-of-the-project)

So it seems we do not see a new version of gitflow in Python (or any other preferred language) here in this repo. If you are looking for the Python version of gitflow head over to https://github.com/htgoebel/gitflow