Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TED: Organisation main activity / classifications #269

Closed
timgdavies opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

TED: Organisation main activity / classifications #269

timgdavies opened this issue Nov 30, 2015 · 6 comments

Comments

@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor

timgdavies commented Nov 30, 2015

TED includes a field for the MAIN_ACTIVITIES or CA_ACTIVITIES (Contracting Authority Activities) of a buyer.

This appears to use the top level of COFOG (UN Classification of the Functions of Government), although with custom textual codes, rather than the numeric COFOG codes (I can't find actual codelists for TED anywhere, apart from within the XML Schema, where 2.09 appears to have different values from 2.08).

We could address TED<->OCDS integration either by adding a:

organization.cofog property

although this wouldn't make much sense when the organization element is used for suppliers or non-governmental buyers.

Alternative, we could introduce a more abstract organization.classifications array, using the classifications model which would allow for different schemes to be used, such as COFOG, ISIC (International System of Industry Classification), and multiple classifications per organisations, though at the cost of moving these off into sub-tables in the flattened serialisation.

Comments welcome.

@timgdavies timgdavies added this to the TED Mapping milestone Nov 30, 2015
@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

TED also has NUTS classifications for buyers (regional area classification).

See: Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS)

This is requested both for Contracting Authorities and Suppliers, so would make sense as a explicit property of Organisation.

@timgdavies timgdavies added the Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions label Nov 30, 2015
@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

Alternatively, we could allow Location Information (#26) to be attached to organisations for NUTS codes, as this includes a way to have a gazeteer entry, for which NUTs could be the codelist used.

@timgdavies
Copy link
Contributor Author

This issue is taken forward in #369

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

Unresolved, but will be resolved with OCDS profile for EU.

@jpmckinney jpmckinney reopened this Aug 26, 2017
@jpmckinney jpmckinney removed the Focus - Extensions Relating to new or proposed extensions, or the governance and maintenance of extensions label Aug 26, 2017
@jpmckinney jpmckinney removed this from the Version 1.1 milestone Aug 26, 2017
@jpmckinney jpmckinney changed the title TED: Organisation Main Activity / Organisation classifications TED: Organisation main activity / classifications Aug 26, 2017
@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

See #262 (comment)

@jpmckinney
Copy link
Member

Closing here, as for now this will be in an extension (linked from above comment), not core. In the next minor/major release, we can consider whether any extensions should become core.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants