Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update military.md #186

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 2, 2014
Merged

Update military.md #186

merged 1 commit into from Jun 2, 2014

Conversation

Proxenia
Copy link
Contributor

The United Kingdom should take a role as international leader in pursuit of global nuclear disarmament, beginning with a promise to discontinue its own existing nuclear arsenal following any reforms of its conventional forces necessary for the United Kingdom to meet its security needs and international obligations. The United Kingdom should be resolutely opposed to horizontal and vertical nuclear proliferation in all forms and lead by example in pursuit of a world free of nuclear warheads and delivery mechanisms.

The United Kingdom should take a role as international leader in pursuit of global nuclear disarmament, beginning with a promise to discontinue its own existing nuclear arsenal following any reforms of its conventional forces necessary for the United Kingdom to meet its security needs and international obligations. The United Kingdom should be resolutely opposed to horizontal and vertical nuclear proliferation in all forms and lead by example in pursuit of a world free of nuclear warheads and delivery mechanisms.
@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

You got my vote 👍

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented May 26, 2014

Agreed here as well 👍

Only one question. Would "nuclear proliferation in all forms" be read as including nuclear energy? The two are often conflated, but I wouldn't want to suggest that we're anti-nuclear power. We can add a clarifying word later though, no problem.

@frankieroberto
Copy link
Contributor

Looks good to me. I think it's worth leaving in something about not renewing Trident though, as that's a very clear commitment. I'd worry that "following any reforms of its conventional forces" leaves open the possibility for this process to take ages too.

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor

+1

1 similar comment
@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor

👍

philipjohn pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 2, 2014
@philipjohn philipjohn merged commit d9ec7a2 into openpolitics:gh-pages Jun 2, 2014
@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

@frankieroberto Fancy proposing that Trident bit in a separate PR?

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Feb 8, 2017

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Agree 👍 :thumbsup: 1
Abstain :hand: -1
Block 👎 :thumbsdown: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

If the proposer makes a change to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants