Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rental rights #217

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2014
Merged

Rental rights #217

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 26, 2014

Conversation

frabcus
Copy link
Contributor

@frabcus frabcus commented Oct 5, 2014

Improve many harms caused by a basic inequity due to the fundamental scarcity of land.

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

Can we ✋ on this one for the moment? I have an in progress change that effectively adopts the Generation Rent manifesto

@frabcus
Copy link
Contributor Author

frabcus commented Oct 5, 2014

They look quite good, but at a glance a bit weak.

Where is their specific policy on improving security of tenure?

I found some horribly privileged comments by landlords, which showed no
understanding how bad it is to have your home at someone else's whimsy.
On 5 Oct 2014 07:59, "philipjohn" notifications@github.com wrote:

Can we : hand: on this one for the moment? I have an in progress change
that effectively adopts the Generation Rent http://generationrent.org
manifesto


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#217 (comment)
.

@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Oct 6, 2014

I like this idea. @philipjohn is there anything in your proposal that conflicts with this? If not, I'd suggest we consider adopting it now anyway and patching further later on.

👍

@PaulJRobinson
Copy link
Contributor

👍


Sent from Mailbox

On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:38 AM, James Smith notifications@github.com
wrote:

I like this idea. @philipjohn is there anything in your proposal that conflicts with this? If not, I'd suggest we consider adopting it now anyway and patching further later on.

👍

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#217 (comment)

@tmtmtmtm
Copy link
Contributor

tmtmtmtm commented Oct 7, 2014

I suspect that there are useful things to learn / copy from the German system here — it's generally regarded as being very strong on renter rights, with most contractual terms set by law, including rent increases, termination, etc.

One potential downside, if not handled correctly, is that although these sorts of approaches can provide much stronger rights once you become a tenant, it's harder to become such in the first place, as landlords have a strong incentive to become much stricter in who they accept.

@frabcus
Copy link
Contributor Author

frabcus commented Oct 7, 2014

+1 for take policy from Germany.
On 7 Oct 2014 08:54, "Tony Bowden" notifications@github.com wrote:

I suspect that there are useful things to learn / copy from the German
system here — it's generally regarded as being very strong on renter
rights, with most contractual terms set by law, including rent increases,
termination, etc.

One potential downside, if not handled correctly, is that although these
sorts of approaches can provide much stronger rights once you become a
tenant, it's harder to become such in the first place, as landlords have a
strong incentive to become much stricter in who they accept.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#217 (comment)
.

@philipjohn
Copy link
Member

Nothing conflicting with my work-in-progress here so let's 👍 and I'll refine as part of my PR

Floppy added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 26, 2014
@Floppy Floppy merged commit 67b17ae into openpolitics:gh-pages Oct 26, 2014
@Floppy
Copy link
Member

Floppy commented Feb 8, 2017

This proposal is open for discussion and voting. If you are a contributor to this repository (and not the proposer), you may vote on whether or not it is accepted.

How to vote

Vote by entering one of the following symbols in a comment on this pull request. Only your last vote will be counted, and you may change your vote at any time until the change is accepted or closed.

vote symbol type this points
Agree 👍 :thumbsup: 1
Abstain :hand: -1
Block 👎 :thumbsdown: -1000

Proposals will be accepted and merged once they have a total of 2 points when all votes are counted. Votes will be open for a minimum of 7 days, but will be closed if the proposal is not accepted after 90.

Votes are counted automatically here, and results are set in the merge status checks below.

Changes

If the proposer makes a change to the proposal, no votes cast before that change will be counted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants